INTERPRETATION (Q # 71):
Ho3: "No
interaction between EAQ and IAQ in terms of whether windows were opened".
F(interaction): 29.38 2,54 df. P<0.01 Reject Ho
The interaction analysis shows that the o/c state of
windows interacts strongly with the EAQ in terms of IAQ. The emphasis in the
interpretation will therefore be on the effects of one independent variable within each
level of the other independent variable.
Ho1:
"regardless of the open/closed state of
the windows, external air quality has no effect on indoor air quality"
Overall, EAQ had a strong effect upon IAQ: The IAQ was best (43.1p/10cc)
when the EAQ was "good", and worst (52.1p/10cc) when EAQ was "poor".
This effect is statistically significant at 0.01.
F(external Q): 30.04, 2,54 df, P<0.01
Reject Ho
In buildings with open windows, this effect is found to be
even stronger (36.6 p/10cc in "good" EAQ), to 54.5 p/10cc in "poor"
EAQ). In buildings with closed windows there is no noticeable effect, with IAQ being
maintained between 49.4 to 49.7 p/10cc throughout.
Ho2:
"Regardless of the EAQ, the open/closed state of the windows has no
effect on IAQ."
Overall, closed buildings showed
a higher (poorer) particle count than open buildings (49.6 v 45.6 p/10cc), This was
statistically significant at 0,01.
F(windows): 17.78, 1,54 df. P<0,01 Reject
Ho
When this effect is considered separately within each type
of EAQ, the effect is clear. In "g" EAQ, open bldgs have much better IAQ than
closed bldgs (36.6 v 49.6 p/10cc); in "m" conditions, the IAQ is similar (45.6 v
49.4 p/10cc), whereas in "p" conditions, open windows appears to produce much
worse IAQ than in closed bldgs (54.5 v 49.7 p/10cc)